A Writ of Summons was filed on behalf of Mr Reehman against his employer CERTIS Security Australia, and the State of NSW for enforcing mandatory Vaccination as part of Order No2, Public Health Act 2010. Mr Reehman has suffered loss of job after being threatened and coerced to submit to PCR testing and mandatory vaccination, to which Mr Reehman declined. The matter was lodged on the 19th of September, and successfully filed in the High Court of Australia on the 20th of September 2021. The two defendants, CERTIS and the State of NSW were served notice of the writ of summons on the 23rd of September 2021. No response has been lodged with the Court at this time. An affidavit of service was filed with the High Court of Australia on the 27th of September 2021. A statement of claim has been drafted by the team at WinningVictoriaBack, and will be filed with the court today, the 1st of October 2021. The subject of the matter is Constitutional, being civil conscription with regards to s51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution.

As per High Court rule 27.01, the defendants have until 7th October to appear

(d) state that the time limited for the appearance of a defendant, where service is effected within Australia is 14 days from the date of service on the defendant, and in any other case is 42 days from the date of service on the defendant;

After the defendants have appeared, we will have 14 days to file for a directions hearing as per High Court Rule 27.06.1:

  1. No later than 14 days after the time referred to in paragraph 27.01(d) for a defendant to file a notice of appearance, the plaintiff must file and serve on all other parties (whether or not those parties have appeared) an application for directions.

A link to the High Court Rules can be found here http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/hcr2004170/s27.01.html

For information about current High Court cases and other information, see https://www.hcourt.gov.au/


  1. Alain Pavelic on October 15, 2021 at 5:30 am

    Please keep in mind for the case that the current vaccines are NOT approved. They are still in phase III trials and experimental use or as the TGA would say “Provisional” approval.

    Therefore how can someone mandate a medical service where no long term side effects are known

  2. Eva on October 16, 2021 at 7:16 am

    Really I feel sick to my stomach.. the fact is that most people that have taken this lethal injection have no idea that it is not a normal vaccine.. I had a podiatrist tell me that it’s just like all other vaccines, I mean his in the medical field and he doesn’t know this.!! Another thing they don’t know is that it’s in phase 3 trials.. and for them to take this there must be written consent.. I don’t understand why this is not the argument in courts..the vaccine is in a trial period and therefore must follow the protocols when enlisting participants.. how can a government say it is safe.. they are lying it is in trial.. how can they mandate it? They can’t force a person to enter into a medical trial.. i just don’t understand why this is not the argument in court ?? End of story there is no more to say.. I do not want to enter into a trial of a new medicine.. that’s it!! Why is it so hard to present that way??

    • Linda Howlett on October 29, 2021 at 4:17 am

      That’s right Eva sometimes the arguments can get bogged down in all the data and constitutional rights etc which is all correct but sometimes all we have to do is state the basic fact that in this case it is still in trial and you cannot force anyone to participate in a medical trial end of story, whether or not the trial looks promising with little or no known side effects thus far or in this case massive red flags flags are raised of injuries (adverse side effects) including death, regardless either way it is illegal to force anyone into a medical trial.

  3. Alan Vaughn on November 2, 2021 at 8:07 pm

    I left this comment for Jacquie Dundee, under a Bitchute video of her and Jimuphy Masters of their recent discussion on his ‘PLannedilLusion’ channel:

    You fail to notice the huge elephant in the room:
    You talk about all the different courts where you have tried in vain and are still going to try again, in an even higher court to prosecute these humanity loathing criminals… who OWN and amend the laws to suit THEIR nefarious agendas. THEIR courts of corruption and lawlessness will NEVER judge us (the downtrodden, subjugated plebes), with farness, justice or without prejudice.
    Dear God Jacquie, WAKE UP!
    You should know by now you are wasting a lot of time and HUGE amounts of money in these corrupt institutions of lawlessness!
    FORGET the law and THEIR biased and corrupt judiciaries. They are not there for us anymore. (Not that they ever were really, but now they’re about as straight as a corkscrew).

    Your money and time would be far better invested in trying to find a way to penetrate the heavy armour of the corrupt, lying mainstream media and once penetrated, getting the truth to flow through the breach, to the now completely dumbed-down masses, to educate them on what’s going on – what this FAKE ‘pandemic’ and its deadly ‘cure’ is really all about and why they MUST NEVER comply with any and ALL of their dehumanizing mandates and diktats.
    If EVERYONE just stopped obeying these tyrants, it would end almost overnight.
    This is war and WE (not the corrupt courts) have to fight it ourselves to take back our God-given freedom and human rights.
    The solution to ending this nightmare is in OUR hands, NOT the corrupt judiciary. No-one is coming to ‘rescue’ us. it’s entirely up to us – we the people.

    I’ll leave you with this thought, it’s supposedly a quote by Albert Einstein, (but many dispute its origin) and please understand, it’s not meant to offend:
    “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”

  4. Betty on November 28, 2021 at 9:49 pm

    What has happened to this case? There’s been absolutely nothing said about it and I can’t find any info that it’s a current case before the High court.

    This seems to me to be a really relevant case, yet there’s no information about it.
    Can anyone offer an update???

Leave a Comment